<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sql-Injection on infosecpwn</title>
    <link>https://infosecpwn.com/tags/sql-injection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sql-Injection on infosecpwn</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://infosecpwn.com/tags/sql-injection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Roundcube CVE-2026-48842: 523,000 exposed servers, about ten of them vulnerable</title>
      <link>https://infosecpwn.com/posts/2026-09-25-roundcube-cve-2026-48842-exposure-is-not-vulnerability/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://infosecpwn.com/posts/2026-09-25-roundcube-cve-2026-48842-exposure-is-not-vulnerability/</guid>
      <description>A four-month-old Roundcube patch is now reportedly being exploited. The headline number everyone is quoting counts internet-facing installs, not vulnerable ones — the affected plugin ships disabled and is inert without configuration. Here is the one grep that settles it for your estate.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
